you're reading...

Italy’s new productivity deal: a critique

Wednesday two of Italy’s three trade union confederations signed a ‘productivity’ deal that sees employers gaining greater ‘flexibility’ to alter contracts and working conditions, with negotiations over labour contracts dealt with at a local level and not through sector-wide collective labour agreements. The largest union confederation CGIL rejected the deal. In return for this the government will provide €2.1 billion  in ‘productivity’ tax incentives until 2014. Economic Development Minister Corrado Passera has claimed the deal would permit an increase in wages and jobs.

Here’s a take on the deal, published a day before it was signed, by Giorgio Cremaschi, a senior figure in the FIOM metalworkers union:

A brutal class scam

The pact on productivity is a concentration of reactionary ideologies and pre-meditated iniquity that is at the basis of the agenda [of prime minister Mario] Monti The basic thesis that inspires it is a brutal class scam.

Italian productivity peaked in the ’70s, when the power of workers in businesses and in the labour market was at its peak. Since then it has been in continual decline, until it collapsed completely when the constraints of the euro and European neo-liberalism strangled the economy.

In all these years wages have regressed, both with respect to profits and in comparison with other OECD countries. An Italian worker  works two months longer a year than his/her German equivalent, but the productivity in Germany tops the league.

So why in Italy is there an agreement that asks people to work more hours in exchange for a much lower salary? For the same reason Monti today boasts of the least generous pension system in Europe, the maximum flexibility among workers, the most brutal cuts to public education and the welfare state, and at the same time proclaims that this is just the beginning and expects that his successors will continue down the same road.

There is a logic to this madness. If Italy is subject to drastic constraints of the European stability pact, of banking and finance, currency, and conservative governments, if the business sector wants to increase profit margins despite the crisis, then it is clear that the only leverage, the only real flexibility is that which comes from the exploitation of labour.

The productivity pact extends throughout the country the system of [Fiat CEO] Marchionne: the few who still work must agree to do so at the global market price – forget [proper] contracts and rights.

All this has nothing to do with the defence of employment, but only profits. Indeed, mass unemployment is necessary to force workers to bend to super-exploitation. Unemployment needs to continue, and grow, otherwise the model will not work.

To this end, the government provides tax cuts only for flexible workers. While the majority of workers’ pay is lowered, a minority can maintain purchasing power if they work more in a company that is doing well, and only the minority will have less tax on payroll. This while funds cannot be found for redundancy or unemployment benefits.

This is not just a union agreement, it is a project of social selection. It is the real answer to Monti’s crisis and the class interests he represents. Interests that require an increasingly brutal social devaluation of the working class, since the exploitation of the last thirty years was insufficient.

This reactionary social model rests on a corporate caste system and organized bureaucratic interests. The whole business sector, including cooperatives and of course small businesses closely linked to the Democratic Party, has signed the text with enthusiasm. Among the trade unions, the signatories are all those who have already signed the same conditions at Fiat, in return for the right to survive under the protection of the owner.

The CGIL has not acceded to it, but is reeling in a sea of ​​contradictions and uncertainties.

The pact on productivity is the third such agreement in recent years that devastates the national contract and all the bargaining power of labour. The first, in January 2009, was not signed by the CGIL. The second of June 28 of 2011, in clear continuity with the previous one, was however, signed by the CGIL, and even the Fiom now demands its full implementation.

This latest pact on productivity clarifies, to the cost of employees, some ambiguous wording of the previous agreement, finally demolishing the national contract.

But signing yes once, and no another time, does not add up to an alternative, even more so when the main contracts signed this season already dispensed an orgy of flexibility…

If it does not want to follow a script already acted out many times, it is not enough not to sign the agreement. If you do not agree with the pact on productivity, we must fight, disobey its rules, clash with those who accept them.

Either you are, even if only passively, with Monti, its politics, its agreements, or you are against them and against their supporters, in the middle there is only impotence and hypocrisy.

Micromega, 20 November 2012

About revoltingeurope

Writer on Europe's Left, trade union and social movements @tomgilltweets or @revoltingeurope


2 thoughts on “Italy’s new productivity deal: a critique

  1. Cremaschi is right, it is a class scam. As are all the so called austerity measures. Why do these measures, applied across the EU, apply only to the mass of working people and the poor of our nations. Where are the “pacts” for bankers and financiers? Where are the “pacts” for politicians?
    The lact of any measures or sanctions for these groups leaves us with the same old system that got us here in the first place. No golden parachutes for the workers, no bonus for those on benefits just a new productivity pact which will destroy national agreements and allow employers to destroy gains made over decades of trade union struggles.
    This “pact” widens the equality divide and pits worker against worker and allows employers to dilute workers rights. Why am I surprised? This is a trend in all so called developed countries and a warning to us all about who we elect and how we elect them. No one can argue about an effective an efficient workforce as well as an effective and efficient finance system not to mention an efficient (for that read not corrupt) government, but the so called solutions seem to be applied disproportionately across these groups.

    Posted by pwest9 | November 22, 2012, 8:29 am


  1. Pingback: [en] FIOM strike and student demonstrations | Struggles in Italy - December 15, 2012

Leave a Reply to pwest9 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Twitter Updates

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow Revolting Europe on WordPress.com

Top Clicks

  • None



The Dossier