Interview with l’Humanite editorial director Patrick Apel-Muller by Vittorio Bonanni
Patrick Apel-Muller is a journalist of L’Humanité, he’s what in France is called the editorial director. A senior editor with some extra powers. So nearly a director, although formally this role is played by the Communist MEP Patrick Le Hyaric, but the latter must divide his responsibilities between the newspaper and the European Parliament in Strasbourg.
Born in 1959, with a long track record of communist militancy and journalistic work, Patrick Apel-Muller welcomes us into the beautiful location of the historical journal of the PCF, located in a suburb of Paris in a modern building in the Rue Pleyel 5 and reminds us straight away how the newspaper, one of the oldest on the Continent, started.
“Ours is a newspaper with a long history – says the journalist. “It was founded in 1904 by Jean Juares, who called it a newspaper of “associates” because Juares’ project was supported by a broad constellation of intellectuals, some of which were indeed associate professors, like the socialist leader. This meant that the newspaper became the tribune of workers’ struggles, a reference point for the socialist galaxy, then very different to today, and finally it was pacifist, ten years before the outbreak of the First World War when militarism was taking hold at an alarming rate both in France and in Germany.
Before the war, it became the newspaper of the Socialist Party, and this choice allowed the title, struggling with serious economic problems, to survive. After the death of its founder and the socialists’ warmonging drift, l’Humanité became the newspaper of the Communist Party, but it has always remained very open to debate and other contributions, much as Juares originally conceived it.”
Over the past decade the Communists in France have changed a lot, up to the recent unitary experience of the Front de Gauche. Has the same thing also happened to l’Humanité?
“Certainly the newspaper has changed. It is no longer the central organ of the PCF, the writing that appears on the masthead, is “newspaper founded by Jean Juares”, and in recent years we have set ourselves the goal of becoming the point of reference for all those who want to address the challenge of a profound transformation of society, and want to find in this newspaper the echo of the debates and issues dealing with different ways to transform society. Its roots are still communist, but with a great openness to other cultures and experiences, such as, for example, left-wing socialists, trade unionists, civil society organisations, or intellectuals who are wondering how we can make this a more human world.”
Is it correct to say that you are the newspaper of the Front de Gauche?
“Absolutely yes. It was us who made the first contacts with the Front de Gauche, positioning ourselves as the newspaper that reported the debates and hopes linked to this political initiative. We are the only newspaper in France that represents this political space, and for this reason we are also able to attract even non-regular readers.”
Is this favourable environment reflected in a consensus among the public, with positive returns in the sales of the newspaper?
‘We sell about 50,000 copies each day, which rise to 75,000 on Sunday with l’Humanité Dimanche, and during 2012 we increased newsstand sales while the vast majority of other newspapers lost readers. Among the newspapers in France we have had the most positive trend in terms of sales.
But we must not rest on our laurels, because circulation across the whole of the French press is falling, by about 25%, and media analysts expect this to continue in the coming years.
Evidently we enjoy advantages because of the originality of our editorial policy, the fact that we are opposed to neoliberal thinking that prevails in the French media. We also have potential readers among all those who do not accept capitalism in France and are wondering how you can continue to survive on our planet. And in fact we constitute an added value to the world of information, using the Internet and by providing new products such as “l’Humanité Europe”, which also publishes articles from all over Europe that ask questions about the future of the Old Continent.
“Then there’s l’Humanité Dimanche, a magazine that comes out on Sunday, book publishing and special issues that have a longer shelf life, on cultural, historical and socio-economic issues. We published a special edition on the anniversary of the death of communist poet, novelist and editor, Louis Aragon, we are preparing one on Picasso, or we have focused on European issues, such as the economic crisis, highlighting alternative solutions.”
In Italy, due to cuts in public financing of publishing, many newspapers, including communist daily Liberazione, have been forced to close or to publish exclusively on online. And now with the back lash against politics that is raging, there is a risk that resources for the press are virtually eliminated with the consequences you can imagine. In France, how does it work?
“The funding here in France comes from various sources. There is a low tax regime for all newspapers. There is also aid to those who modernise but support is distributed, paradoxically, according to the financial situation of the newspapers themselves, favouring those who have more resources. For example if you invest 100,000 euros the state gives you as much again, but if you do not have that kind of money you’re penalized. In short, this is a measure that favours the strongest. Then there is aid to those newspapers that have little advertising, like us, Libération and the Catholic newspaper La Croix. This is designed to counterbalance the pressures of financial groups on advertising choices. We also participate in a publishers’ cooperative called Presstalis, established immediately after the Liberation of France, which fought so that in the distribution of newspapers the same conditions prevailed for all the titles.”
Have there been cuts at l’Humanite too?
“In 2010-2012 we had a cut amounting to a million Euros for us, which was heavy for our coffers. In Italy, especially with the Monti government, the idea has taken hold that it should be the market that decides the fate of a title. In France, the scenario is different, but we also have people who claim that only the wealthy media outlets should survive. The battle thus revolves around the presence of a plurality of titles. With us there have been several incidents that have caused a crisis of confidence in the press. For example, in 2005, all newspapers except l’Humanité and some weeklies, took a position in favour of the European Constitution. We all remember the result of the referendum of 29 May 2005, when 55% of the French voted No. After that the gulf that separated the media from the public widened and led to a crisis of confidence in the press. Even on the issue of pensions, 65% of the French were hostile to proposed reforms while the vast majority of the media supported them, thereby fueling this mistrust. The following trends occurred: on the one hand costly information, consisting mainly of the newspapers, all in favour of neo-liberal policies, on the other, low cost information, made up of newspapers distributed for free, or dominated by the Internet, where ownership by telcos prevails and a ‘normalized’ version of the news is also produced.”
Even a prestigious and progressive title like “le Monde” has become part of this [neo-liberal] chorus?
“Even this newspaper has lost its prestige, becoming banal and failing to standing out from the pensee unique [AKA There is No Alternative] It is still a media landmark with its own prestige but it is no longer the same product or has the same readership that it used to have.”
You talked of a favourable moment in time for the life of l’Humanité. What was, instead, the most difficult moment for your newspaper?
“We too went through a very serious financial crisis, in the late 90s and the beginning of the new century. We were also forced to reduce staff but thanks in part to the mobilization of readers who have contributed two million Euros, and the sale of several properties we owned we were able to resist, and now, as I said before, the situation of our sales is in contrast with the other titles.”
Translation/editing by Revolting Europe